From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:

Including the surnames Tapley, Drake, Page, Harrell, Odom, Claxton, Bush, Swain, and Schwalls from the U.S. Southeast; and Ranney, Hubbard, Hesser, Carter, Schoonover, and Ozmun/Ozman/Osman from the U.S. Northeast and Midwest
From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:

In 19th-century South and Middle Georgia, the terms "farm laborer," "farm hand," and "farmer" had distinct meanings, reflecting social and economic differences:
A farmer was typically the owner or manager of a farm.
They usually owned the land and resources and made decisions about planting, harvesting, and managing livestock.
Farmers could range from small subsistence farmers to large plantation owners.
They often had a higher social standing compared to laborers and hands, especially if they were successful landowners.
A farm hand was an employee who worked on a farm.
They were typically hired laborers who lived either on the farm or nearby.
Farm hands were usually paid wages or received room and board in exchange for their work.
Their tasks were diverse, from plowing and planting to feeding livestock and performing general maintenance.
Unlike laborers, farm hands were often semi-permanent workers and might work on the same farm for many years.
A farm laborer was generally a temporary or seasonal worker.
They often performed manual, unskilled labor, such as picking cotton, harvesting crops, or clearing fields.
Farm laborers could be tenant farmers, sharecroppers, freedmen, or migratory workers (especially after the Civil War).
Laborers were typically paid by the day or task, and their employment was more unstable compared to farm hands.
Socially, farm laborers were considered at the bottom of the rural economic ladder.
Ownership and Control: Farmers owned or managed the farm; farm hands were hired workers; laborers were often temporary or hired by the day.
Stability: Farm hands had more stable and possibly longer-term employment than laborers.
Social Status: Farmers held the highest status, followed by farm hands, then farm laborers.
Economic Relationship: Farmers profited from production; farm hands earned steady wages; laborers were often paid per job or task.
In summary, the distinctions reflected both employment stability and social hierarchy, shaped by economic realities of the region, especially in the context of agricultural practices and labor systems of the time."
So I definitely learned some things about the social hierarchy of farming and my 2nd great-grandfathers doing this exercise!
From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:
2) Tell us about your ancestor's "different" occupation, and what "Sam" had to say about it in your own blog post, in a comment on this post, or in a Facebook post. Please leave a link on this post if you write your own post.
What Would a Constable Be Doing in 1917-1918?
I chose this occupation because I haven't heard the South or even the United States reference a constable. To me a constable was in Canada. We have police officers, police chiefs, sheriffs, and deputies. So I was curious if there was a difference. After searching Google, I found out that the difference is that constables enforced both criminal and civil laws whereas police officers enforce criminal and traffic laws.
John Mullis Fields (1883-1957) was the husband of my 3rd cousin, 2x removed, Mayme Lorena Dukes (1886-1938). She and I are related on the Tapley branch of my tree.
After getting this information about a constable, I asked "Sam" to create a description of an image that would show John Mullis Fields as a successful constable. Here is what "Sam" created:
The scene is a bustling Main Street in
Vidalia, Georgia, circa 1917, lined with brick storefronts, wooden
sidewalks, and a few early automobiles parked alongside horse-drawn wagons. At
the center of the image stands John Mullis
Fields, a commanding yet approachable figure in his well-pressed dark uniform with a brass star-shaped badge pinned
to his chest. His neatly combed hair and serious expression give off
an air of quiet authority, though there’s a slight upturn at the corner of his
mouth—suggesting he’s well-respected, not feared.
To his right, a group of
townspeople—shopkeepers, farmers, and a few young boys in suspenders—watch as
he speaks to a man, possibly settling a minor dispute. His leather belt carries a revolver and a baton,
but his hands remain at ease, showing that his presence alone is enough to
maintain order. Behind him, a wanted poster
for a local moonshiner flutters on a wall, a reminder of Georgia’s prohibition
era, a law he was sworn to enforce.
In the background, a 1910s-era courthouse stands proudly, symbolizing
justice, while a telegram office and a
general store hint at the town’s daily rhythms. Perhaps a newspaper headline in a storefront
reads, "Constable Fields Thwarts Local
Disturbance," further cementing his reputation.
This image captures John Mullis Fields in his
prime—a steadfast, fair-handed constable
who kept the peace in a growing Southern town, ensuring law and order with both
wisdom and strength.
Now I don't know if that describes John Fields at all, but it sure paints a flattering picture!
OK, after reading Randy's comment, I decided to go for it and see if ChatGP4 would help me out with an image. It did and here you go:
![]() |
| Mom (on the right) with Kathy at Mom's 40th anniversary recognition |
![]() |
| Mom in her cubicle on Walton Way Ext in Augusta, right before she retired. |
![]() |
| From "The Wrightsville Headlight," January 1, 1920 |
As you can see, at different times in his life he was a: mechanic, truck driver, heavy equipment operator, self-employed businessman, and carpenter.

So my father wore many different hats in his lifetime. I think he did well enough for himself considering he only had a 7th grade education.