From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:
My query: "In the 19th century in south and middle Georgia, what was the difference between a farm laborer, a farm hand, and a farmer?"
ChatGPT replied:
Including the surnames Tapley, Drake, Page, Harrell, Odom, Claxton, Bush, Swain, and Schwalls from the U.S. Southeast; and Ranney, Hubbard, Hesser, Carter, Schoonover, and Ozmun/Ozman/Osman from the U.S. Northeast and Midwest
From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:
From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:
Please comment on this post by clicking the title of the post and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of the post. Feel free to share it on social media. Or you may contact me by email at liz.genresearch@gmail.com. Note that all comments are moderated and may not appear immediately.
From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:
In 19th-century South and Middle Georgia, the terms "farm laborer," "farm hand," and "farmer" had distinct meanings, reflecting social and economic differences:
A farmer was typically the owner or manager of a farm.
They usually owned the land and resources and made decisions about planting, harvesting, and managing livestock.
Farmers could range from small subsistence farmers to large plantation owners.
They often had a higher social standing compared to laborers and hands, especially if they were successful landowners.
A farm hand was an employee who worked on a farm.
They were typically hired laborers who lived either on the farm or nearby.
Farm hands were usually paid wages or received room and board in exchange for their work.
Their tasks were diverse, from plowing and planting to feeding livestock and performing general maintenance.
Unlike laborers, farm hands were often semi-permanent workers and might work on the same farm for many years.
A farm laborer was generally a temporary or seasonal worker.
They often performed manual, unskilled labor, such as picking cotton, harvesting crops, or clearing fields.
Farm laborers could be tenant farmers, sharecroppers, freedmen, or migratory workers (especially after the Civil War).
Laborers were typically paid by the day or task, and their employment was more unstable compared to farm hands.
Socially, farm laborers were considered at the bottom of the rural economic ladder.
Ownership and Control: Farmers owned or managed the farm; farm hands were hired workers; laborers were often temporary or hired by the day.
Stability: Farm hands had more stable and possibly longer-term employment than laborers.
Social Status: Farmers held the highest status, followed by farm hands, then farm laborers.
Economic Relationship: Farmers profited from production; farm hands earned steady wages; laborers were often paid per job or task.
In summary, the distinctions reflected both employment stability and social hierarchy, shaped by economic realities of the region, especially in the context of agricultural practices and labor systems of the time."
So I definitely learned some things about the social hierarchy of farming and my 2nd great-grandfathers doing this exercise!
from left to right:
Charles Morgan Tapley (1907-1973),
Ethel Irene Ranney Tapley (1913-1973)
James Tillman "Fella" Tapley (1904-1974)
Charles and Fella were brothers; the oldest children of
Lusion Keman Tapley (1870-1935) and
Mattie Schwalls (1877-1912)
Charles and Ethel were my maternal grandparents.
I was very young when Uncle James passed but I do recall visiting him in Macon. He was the oldest son. He was the one everyone counted on. He was there when any of his siblings needed anything from food to a place to stay.
This picture was taken at a family reunion circa 1962 in Macon, Georgia.
From Randy (a cousin discovery!!) over at Genea-Musings:
From Randy (a cousin discovery!!) over at Genea-Musings:
From Randy (a cousin discovery!!) over at Genea-Musings:
Amy Johnson Crow from Generations Cafe is again hosting the blog writing prompt this year called 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2021. I'm going to try to participate more fully this year. I like that she gives us "permission" to interpret the prompt however we wish and share it however we wish. It doesn't have to be a blog post; it could be a family video, a letter to a child or grandchild, an e-mail, etc.
The Theme for Week 8 (Feb 22-28) is Power.
When I heard this theme, my first thought was quite literal: Power, as in electrical power. The reason for this is I remembered finding the easements for right-of-way filed in the Johnson County, Georgia Deed records for my grandparents, Lusion K Tapley (1870-1935) and Nealie V Drake Tapley (1895-1970). They signed these easements over to Georgia Power Company for them to run electrical lines and put up electrical poles on my grandparents' land for the Dellwood-Wrightsville lines.
Evidently, my grandparents owned two pieces of land. One was in Lusion's name, located in the 55th GM District, and the other in Nealie's, located in the 1326th GM District. His parcel must have been quite small because Georgia Power only paid him $10.00 for the right-of-way "upon a strip of land one hundred (100) feet in width." Whereas Georgia Power paid Nealie $65 for the same sized strip across her land.
These deeds were recorded on June 11 and June 16, 1927, respectively. So that is when electric lights came to Johnson County. All of my grandparents' neighbors granted the same basic easement right-of-way, being paid varying amounts depending on the size of their land.
One of Lusion's neighbors, whose land his bordered, was C.M. Schwalls, the brother of Lusion's second wife, Mattie Schwalls. One of Nealie's neighbors was W.S. Pool, though already passed by this time, who was the father of Lusion's sister-in-law, Reida Mae Poole. Reida Mae was married to his oldest brother, James "Fella." (The W.S. could have also referred to Reida Mae's brother. The land may have passed to him.) Such is small towns (and counties!).
I recall the day I found these while searching the Johnson County Courthouse for deed records. I was in awe. I've had electricity my entire life. I had never given any thought about when electrical lines were first run across the land. My father was born a year after these easements were recorded, and evidently he found it interesting also. I remember him poring over them. I can't say that during his childhood, my father always had electricity, because the family was poor, and electricity wasn't free. But electricity was available in the area his whole life. [I am sure this had an effect on him and is why he was so diligent in paying the power (or "light") bill on time or early throughout his life.]
We tend to take power for granted. Folks moan and groan when it goes out for a few hours or even a few minutes. But once upon a time, less than 100 years ago, my family did not even have electricity run to their house. I am grateful every time I flip a switch.
From Randy (a cousin discovery!!) over at Genea-Musings: