From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:

Including the surnames Tapley, Drake, Page, Harrell, Odom, Claxton, Bush, Swain, and Schwalls from the U.S. Southeast; and Ranney, Hubbard, Hesser, Carter, Schoonover, and Ozmun/Ozman/Osman from the U.S. Northeast and Midwest
From Randy (my cousin) over at Genea-Musings:

In 19th-century South and Middle Georgia, the terms "farm laborer," "farm hand," and "farmer" had distinct meanings, reflecting social and economic differences:
A farmer was typically the owner or manager of a farm.
They usually owned the land and resources and made decisions about planting, harvesting, and managing livestock.
Farmers could range from small subsistence farmers to large plantation owners.
They often had a higher social standing compared to laborers and hands, especially if they were successful landowners.
A farm hand was an employee who worked on a farm.
They were typically hired laborers who lived either on the farm or nearby.
Farm hands were usually paid wages or received room and board in exchange for their work.
Their tasks were diverse, from plowing and planting to feeding livestock and performing general maintenance.
Unlike laborers, farm hands were often semi-permanent workers and might work on the same farm for many years.
A farm laborer was generally a temporary or seasonal worker.
They often performed manual, unskilled labor, such as picking cotton, harvesting crops, or clearing fields.
Farm laborers could be tenant farmers, sharecroppers, freedmen, or migratory workers (especially after the Civil War).
Laborers were typically paid by the day or task, and their employment was more unstable compared to farm hands.
Socially, farm laborers were considered at the bottom of the rural economic ladder.
Ownership and Control: Farmers owned or managed the farm; farm hands were hired workers; laborers were often temporary or hired by the day.
Stability: Farm hands had more stable and possibly longer-term employment than laborers.
Social Status: Farmers held the highest status, followed by farm hands, then farm laborers.
Economic Relationship: Farmers profited from production; farm hands earned steady wages; laborers were often paid per job or task.
In summary, the distinctions reflected both employment stability and social hierarchy, shaped by economic realities of the region, especially in the context of agricultural practices and labor systems of the time."
So I definitely learned some things about the social hierarchy of farming and my 2nd great-grandfathers doing this exercise!
Amy Johnson Crow from Generations Cafe is again hosting the blog writing prompt this year called 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2021. I'm going to try to participate more fully this year. I like that she gives us "permission" to interpret the prompt however we wish and share it however we wish. It doesn't have to be a blog post; it could be a family video, a letter to a child or grandchild, an e-mail, etc.
The Theme for Week 4 (Jan 25-31) is Favorite Photo.
Most of my favorite photos had already been shared on this blog. However, I kept looking, and I think I finally found a contender.
![]() |
This a picture of my Great Uncle Kenneth Carter Ranney (1909-1989). I am guessing this photo was taken in Duplain, Clinton County, Michigan about 1920. That would have made Uncle Kenneth about 11 years old, and that seems about right.
That is a kitten on his head, and a chicken near him. His father, Luther Boardman Ranney (1870-1943), was a farmer in Michigan before the family moved to California. This picture has all the markings of having been taken on a farm, right down to Uncle Kenneth's overalls and boots.
Someone, possibly his mother, Bessie Alice Carter Ranney (1883-1960), wrote on this picture, "Kenneth acting silly." I'm glad in the midst of the hard work of a farm, the children could find a moment to enjoy themselves and act a little silly.
Oh, and the love of cats passed right down from Bessie to her children, including my grandmother, to my mother, and to me.